Multi-sport environments

In my last piece, I discussed what other sports can be analogous to ultimate. (there are a few comments on it; if you didn't read them, it might be worth another look). I really hope people find some use in analogies with non-North American sports; purely because the rest of the world needs all the advantages it can get if we're ever to challenge North American dominance.

I found this article interesting too; based on some studies of the birthplace of professional athletes in the states, the author speculates that it's better to partake in a wide variety of sports when you're young. As opposed to the Tiger Woods approach of early specialisation.

Perhaps this is something we can consider an advantage to us? (Alas, probably not over the Americans).

I think (without much supporting evidence) that playing a wide variety of different sports is more common for kids in Ireland, than in most countries. I still remember the out-half of our under 16 Rugby team leaving at half time to go and play a Hurling match and such occurrences weren't considered unusual of a Saturday morning.

Of course, there aren't many ultimate players that have never played anything else, so the base number when comparing how many other sports people have played is probably at least 1.

The other sports most relevant to Ultimate

I was discussing this with Shimbo over the summer.

Some of what I've read online has lead me to believe that American Football and Basketball seem to be the sports that have skills and tactics most relevant to our own. For instance: a Sockeye player mentions that their "offense uses basketball terminology" and here are some other ultimate blog references to these sports.

Considering that these are popular American sports, it almost seems like an advantage to the American teams. They can take concepts from these games to innovate in ultimate, in ways that those not as familiar with the games, can not. And perhaps individual players with backgrounds in these sports might be at an advantage.

But of course, one of the main reasons why the comparisons get made, is that all of these writers are from North America. These are the sports they know.

Perhaps there are Irish sports with which analogies can be made? Of our 2 main native games; Hurling and Gaelic football, I think Gaelic might be more useful. Hurling is too fast. Man-marking a guy in Gaelic could be a fairly similar skill as man to man defence in Ultimate, right?  There does seem to be quite a few decent Irish ultimate players that used to play Gaelic. So I can speculate that it helps.

Now I wonder if there are any tactical concepts or even terminology we can take.

How different people look at the field differently

How many open cutters do you generally see when you have the disc? I imagine the answer is one. After you see one, you stop looking for more. If there are two open cutters, I'd usually only see one of them. At least until I either throw to that option, or decide it's no longer open and look for another option.

I think we've all been in the situation, where as an open cutter, we consider ourselves to be the best option. But frustratingly, the thrower only sees some other cutter. When the other option results in a turnover, that's annoying.

Which of two different options is a thrower more likely to see? 
The one they see first is the one that's in the place where they look first. If a player really likes to huck it deep, they probably look there first. If there is a good hucking opportunity, they won't see an open cutter underneath.

Similarly, other players have their own first-look preferences. Plenty instinctively look first for a flow cut down the line. Looking at the person who threw it to you first can be a good move.

I'm still thinking about 2 questions
1- is it easy to change where you look first? Or are habits formed over many years of playing too ingrained to change?

2 - is it preferable to have a whole team looking for the same first option? Or is it preferable to have variety based on the different skill sets of players?

Anyway, look out for this. It's useful to see the patterns of where you, you're team-mates and your opponents are looking.

Irish juniors teams - I'm just looking for some thoughts

Given that the call for applications to be on the NSB for the European juniors championship is out at the moment, I’ve been thinking about the juniors set up a bit. I’m not sure whether I want to apply to be involved in it again next year or not. In any case, I’ve been writing down some of my thoughts on the good and the bad of the juniors set up last year. If anyone is considering applying to be a part of the juniors coaching set up next year (or knows someone else who is), and wants to ask me anything about it, feel free to email me (or add a comment here). 

There is one idea that I’ve been thinking over that I’d love to hear thoughts on.

For the juniors in 2009 and 2010 we ran a weekly practice session in Dublin. I’ve been thinking about how worthwhile it is. In many ways, a national team practicing so regularly like a club team should give a big advantage in terms of team chemistry. But, at the level that we’re at, improvements in player skill and general playing experience makes a much bigger difference to results than team chemistry does. To improve as a team, focus on improving the player’s skills and general playing experience, not so much the team's chemistry.

The most obvious way to go about this would be if all the players played with club teams. If we take all the juniors and put them in a completely separate section away from the experienced senior players (as has been the case) they won’t learn that much. But if they were all on club teams with more experienced players they’d gain a greater understanding of the game much more quickly.

Does anyone care to offer me their opinion on the chances of the juniors all being integrated into the club scene? I’m not imagining them all necessarily making the first team of the best club in their city, just being a regular club member that trains weekly and hopefully gets to a tournament or two. Or maybe club summer league, or whatever.

any thoughts?

The Ireland junior open team

My brother has been working on a document about teaching ultimate in schools. He asked me if I'd write a piece about the junior national team for it. So that any new schools players or coaches would know the situation regarding the team, how to get on it, what's involved and so forth. He sent me a few questions, and my answers are reproduced here.

Just for anyone that doesn't know, I was the manager of the Irish Junior open team in 2010, having been an assistant manager in 2009. The 2010 team was put together for the World junior ultimate championships held in Germany at the beginning of august. While the 2009 team competed at the European junior ultimate championships held in Austria in 2009. The European juniors championships will happen again in 2011 and Worlds again in 2012.

As for next year, I'm not sure if I'll be involved. Either way, the set up could all change in the future, so don't think this is a reliable guide to what might happen in 2011.

Be warned, this gets long.

On rereading this, I'm thinking it might sound like hard work. It is hard work, but its fun too. Ask any of the players that played for the Irish Juniors in 2009 or 2010 about it. I bet they'd recommend any eligible player to have a go.



Quick recap of what you did this year with the junior setup. When were trials, and trainings (how many were there), and what did you do at trials and trainings?


Try-outs and selection

At first I sent out some email calls for interest. I requested all interested players to email me to say which division they were interested in and eligible for. Mainly to figure out what divisions we’d likely be able to field teams for. I mean one of junior open, junior women (for which you must be turning 19 or less in the year of the competition), under 17 open and under 17 women. We have yet to field a team in any junior division other than junior open.

The first selection events we had (which we called tryout zero A and B) were the Irish schools indoors championships and the UCD beginners tournament (which were on consecutive weekends at the end of Januray). Most of the eligible players that the junior’s management team didn’t know were playing at one of these two tournaments, so it gave us a good chance to get to know the available player base.

Next we had 2 proper open tryouts. The first was a week into February, and the next about 3 weeks later. Any and every eligible player was welcome to attend.

Finally we had an invite only try-out. Where about 30 or so players were invited to attend. This allowed us to have a really close look at those players with a good chance of making the team before we made the final selection.

When I say ‘we’ here, I mean myself, the juniors manager and Seamas Kinsella, the coach, with help from selectors Mark Earley and Roger ‘Podge’ Beatty.

Training and practices

Last year, we had a team with a majority of Dublin based players, although there was also a contingent based in Cork and Limerick. As such, we had a weekly Dublin practice session (only mandatory for those based there, with non-dubliners expected to attend a weekly practice session local to them). And then we had a number of full squad weekends (mandatory for the whole squad), which were about monthly. The first one was in Limerick; the other 3 or so in Dublin.

There was also a fitness plan, involving some weekly core work, leg work and sprints.

Friendlies and warm up competitions
We had a few one off friendlies against various other teams often as part of the whole squad weekends - just to get some game time together as a team.

We entered the Dublin club summer league. Wednesday evenings in a Dublin park. From about June as I recall. Obviously, this was mainly for those based in Dublin. 

And to warm up for the tournament, we entered the UK junior club nationals; a great learning experience. in 2010 that was in Birmingham, on about the first weekend of July. So most of the lads got some cheap flights over (1 or 2 hardcore juniors got a bus and a ferry). The team camped at the venue. (with the aid of one big tippee)

What did you look for when picking the squad and why? And in what part of the game did players have the most shortcomings in?
There aren’t many very experienced junior players in Ireland. In general, the majority of the team is made of players who have been playing for less than a year. As such, the major shortcomings of most of the players that try out can be put down to a lack of experience playing the game, this means that players can be lacking in some basic skills, tactical awareness and so forth. As the selectors, there is no choice but to accept this. So while it's great to see skills and tactical awareness, we also look out for a willingness and ability to learn fast, commitment / enthusiasm and athleticism.

What advice would you give to any upcoming juniors who would like to try out for Ireland.
Firstly – the simple advice: try to make a good impression.

• Attending every tryout you can, shows that you’re good at showing up.
• Being on time for tryouts would give selectors the impression that you’d be on time for practices, or eventually for matches at the tournament.
• Taking on board anything that the coaches say to you, shows you’ll be willing and able to learn as the season progresses.
• Try to seem like a ‘good team mate’. If you’re a jerk to the other players trying out, it really won’t seem like a good idea to put you on a team with them.

Next - the more detailed stuff.

Picking the squad has usually gone like this: the first half of the squad or so worth of players are usually fairly obvious choices. These 9 or 10 or 11 or 12 guys stand out as the best players, which all the selectors agree on quickly. The next 3 or 4 or 5 players generally don’t take too long to agree on either. In terms of skill, athleticism, experience and commitment, they’re looking better than the other guys there. The last few guys selected are generally very hard to decide on. Choosing the last 3 or 4 guys out of 8 or 9 players with a realistic chance is difficult.

And so, my advice to anyone trying out for these teams in the future: don’t hope to scrape your way onto the squad by being just about good enough. Even if you really are the 19th best player and there are 20 spots, the selectors might make a mistake (regrettable but very possible). Aim to be in the top 10 players that the selectors have no question about choosing. For the juniors team I'd say that being athletic and skilful compared with the other guys trying out should get you into the top 15 or so, but its experience that will make you stand out as one of the best there. By experience, I don’t mean how long ago you started playing; but rather how high a level you’ve been playing. If you join a club team full of good players and get plenty of game time in high standard games you’ll look like you have experience, like you understand what's going on. If you spend 3 years playing exclusively with absolute beginners, you won't get the same effect.

Anyway, if you’re reading this having only just started playing a week ago, and the tryouts are soon, don’t despair. you'd still have a shot at making the team, like I said, there's generally not very many experienced players there. and the last few guys to make the team are really tough to choose. Realistically, the guys that get selected in this group are unlikely to called as a  handler for offence on game point (although nothing is impossible). As such, around this borderline area, fast, fit defenders will probably get selected over the slower handler types. I think athleticism does better than skill to a certain extent around here.

Experience has shown me something about comparing two guys at the start of the season; one who’s fast, fit, jumps high and lays out but can’t throw too well and another who’s slow and un-athletic but can throw well. By the time the peak of the season comes around it’s more likely that the fast guy has learned to throw than the slow guy has learned to be fast.

What If you’re some sort of non-athletic type. First step, become athletic! By which I mainly mean get fit. Don't just try to figure out how you can make a team based purely on skill and intelligence. The intelligent thing to do is to get in shape. Everyone has to play D. So do what you can to be in great shape. Realistically, if athleticism is your major weakness even though you're doing all you can about it, you’ll want to make sure you get into the team by being one of the best, most skilful players there. If you’re hoping to squeeze in as the 19th player picked onto a 20 man squad, you may be disappointed. Go get yourself the highest level game time you can.

Tryouts

Here's a quick summary of the format of the tryouts from previous years. (subject to change in the future). 

They usually consist of a warm up, some basic throwing, a few drills designed to show certain skills, and then a few games. All run and watched by various coaches / managers and selectors for the team. 

When I ran it we had a few different parts.

1. Throwing. Everyone threw in pairs, I came around and had a look. I was mainly looking to see who had fundamentally good technique (grip, stance, etc) as opposed to whether a particular throw was accurate or not as I walked past. I saw loads of throwing, from everyone. I'd often have asked a player to throw a few particular throws if I hadn't yet seen them (e.g. "throw a few backhands there, I've only seen you throw forehands"). I also often asked to see low release throws, longer throws and inside out throws; just to see how advanced anyone was at throwing. Such throws demonstrate a real control of the disc or possibly show up more clearly any flaw in technique (some people can only release throws from one particular height, it seemed). 
2. Sprinting. We had everyone run a timed sprint. Just to make sure that when it came to a selection meeting I wasn't calling guys athletic based purely on looking athletic. (of course in games we'd try to look at acceleration and agility and all too, but pure straight line speed was useful to know about and really easy to measure).
3. Huck and read drill. This was also to look at athleticism in a way, and also catching ability and ability to read the disc in flight.
4. Leading passes. Just since previously I had only looked at throwing skills in a static sense, throws in games have to lead receivers and inexperienced players often don't have the timing down. 
5. We may have done some other drills at the some other tryouts, possibly looking at forcing (the most important defensive skill in my opinion).
6. Games. There was always a game at each tryout; drills can only show so much. In general, we'd make some teams and just stand back and watch, only interjecting sometimes to change the teams or to ask for specific things (as in we asked everyone to only play man defence, we occasionally requested guys to mark specific players or requested certain lads to handle or to cut).

Finally, some advice for these tryout games. Be sure to get properly involved. At times, in previous years I've thought some guys were hiding on the field for fear of being seen making an occasional mistake. It's not like the team is picked by a process of elimination, you can't make it by hiding! Now obviously, try not to throw the disc away every time you get it, but don’t worry, there’ll be plenty of mistakes made, just keep up a total commitment on the field, especially on defence, and try with all you've got to show that you belong in an Ireland jersey.

No discussion 'foul' and 'contest' calls

There are many ways to be unspirited. Some of them bug me more than others.

This one is fairly self explanatory. A player calls "foul" and their opponent immediately calls "contest". One player tries to explain what they think just happened. The other is already sending the disc back to the thrower (or asking for the disc back if they are the thrower); they're not listening. This gives the impression to me that they're only making or contesting the call to advantage their team, rather than fully considering the play in question.

Breaking other rules, like for instance fouling somebody, can be seen as purely accidental. But refusing to engage in a discussion seems a less accidental way of breaking the rules. And it bugs me.

The rule:
"1.3. ... players must:...
1.3.4. explain their viewpoint clearly and briefly;
1.3.5. allow opponents a reasonable chance to speak;..."

If you think you're right, okay. Tell the other player why. They might retract the call.

If you just want to gain an unfair advantage, well, the rules are such that you can do that, but please humour them. Pretend it's the scenario where you honestly think you're right. Let the other player explain their point of view and then choose one detail that you can say you saw differently. Contest the call based on that. People will think you're more spirited.

Blog Link - a piece about gamesmanship in ultimate

I just wanted to point out this. From the ultimate blog 'win the fields'. (and the second part)

A post (a series of posts I guess) about gamesmanship in ultimate.

It's a really interesting read.